Please also let me know if you have tips, ideas, or advice."Who can show me a simple way to import RED MXF video into FCP X on Mac? I don't like the RED Plugin for Final Cut Pro X. So what format will you choose? Let me know in the comments below. My advice is to always have a lot of high speed storage prepared in your studio for just these purposes. At least with transcodes and proxies, you can safely delete them when the project is complete. You do indeed use a lot of storage up with source files, transcodes, proxies, preview files, etc. Perhaps I should buy stock in high speed storage companies. I love having the ability to have super awesome playback performance (using intraframe proxies at HD frame size) with the added benefit of being able to pull off a smart rendered export. The best scenario, I think, is to have both proxies and transcodes-but that's a personal preference.
It goes without saying that you should test all of this before wasting time and storage in creating a full set of transcoded files.īy the way, if any of the transcoded files play back with difficulty, you can always create individual proxies for those files as you are editing. That said, i f your system is just not powerful enough to play back transcodes with performance and/or fractional resolution to your liking, simply create proxies. 4K ProRes transcodes might playback just fine on your computer (especially at lower resolutions) so you may not need the performance proxies can give you. Fixing mistakes on watch down can be easily repaired and a re-export takes a fraction of the time a H.264 export would take.
is an even better scenario than proxies for some because you have the benefit of much better playback performance, and you can use smart rendering to make your Cineform exports lightning fast.
This fact doesn't appear to be changing any time soon.įrom my perspective, having transcodes (simple copies) to Cineform, etc. Because these formats create such a highly compressed video file, they are exceedingly difficult for your computer to handle, especially regarding playback and file handling. Consider that mobile phones, DSLR/Mirrorless cameras, drones, VR cameras, screen captures, webcams, and more all use these formats.
mp4 wrapped H.264 or H.265, typically) are the dominant consumer format. That's why they're great choices for both transcodes and proxies. NLE software from any manufacturer (Premiere Pro included) will have much better performance during playback with these intermediate formats. Explanation: Intra-frame vs Inter-frame Compression Intraframe formats are equally great, though some have their preferences for formats, quality choices, and frame sizes. These formats are referred to as intraframe formats, not interframe formats.
If you're in this position, make sure your storage is very, very fast portable storage or you're going to be back where you started from with a badly performing timeline.Ĭineform, DNxHD/HR, and ProRes are all cross platform, visually lossless, professional quality "mezzanine" (some editors refer to them as "intermediate") codecs. So when you're creating proxies for being easier on your machine, why throw one of the hardest codecs to decode as your proxy format? It doesn't make sense.Ī case where H.264 proxies sort of makes sense to me is when you have a large amount of footage and a small amount of storage and you need a very "portable" version of your project. So why not H.264? The hard truth is that H.264 is terrible to edit with. Most editors prefer to use Cineform, DNxHD/HR, or ProRes formats for their proxy files in Premiere Pro.